Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User id module: Ability to store user IDs in cookie and localStorage simultaneously #11482

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

carlosfelix
Copy link
Contributor

Type of change

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • New bidder adapter
  • Updated bidder adapter
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Does this change affect user-facing APIs or examples documented on http://prebid.org?
  • Other

Description of change

Introduce a third storage method that saves IDs to both cookie and localStorage. Details can be found in the issue link below.

Other information

Issue: #11274
Documentation: prebid/prebid.github.io#5315

modules/userId/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
modules/userId/index.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@ncolletti ncolletti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ncolletti ncolletti merged commit caa2b8b into prebid:master May 24, 2024
4 checks passed
zkosanovic pushed a commit to OpenWeb-Public/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
…simultaneously (prebid#11482)

* Refactoring - break functions that are handling multiple storage types.

* user id: introduce the concept of enabled storage types

* refactor the way enabled storage types are populated
DecayConstant pushed a commit to mediavine/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
…simultaneously (prebid#11482)

* Refactoring - break functions that are handling multiple storage types.

* user id: introduce the concept of enabled storage types

* refactor the way enabled storage types are populated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants